C163 Strategic Leadership and Future Delivery Models PowerPoint

The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.

The candidate provides weak articulation of response.

The candidate provides limited articulation of response.

The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.

The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.

The candidate does not provide the HCAHPS scores for the chosen hospital.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

The candidate provides the HCAHPS scores for the chosen hospital.

The candidate does not provide an appropriate comparison of the scores to state and national averages.

The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with no detail, of the scores to state and national averages.

The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with limited detail, of the scores to state and national averages.

The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with adequate detail, of the scores to state and national averages.

The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with substantial detail, of the scores to state and national averages.

The candidate does not provide an appropriate comparison of the scores to 2 other hospitals in the region.

The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with no detail, of the scores to 2 other hospitals in the region.

The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with limited detail, of the scores to 2 other hospitals in the region.

The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with adequate detail, of the scores to 2 other hospitals in the region.

The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with substantial detail, of the scores to 2 other hospitals in the region.

The candidate does not provide an appropriate comparison of the survey response rates to 2 other hospitals in the region.

The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with no detail, of the survey response rates to 2 other hospitals in the region.

The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with limited detail, of the survey response rates to 2 other hospitals in the region.

The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with adequate detail, of the survey response rates to 2 other hospitals in the region.

The candidate provides an appropriate comparison, with substantial detail, of the survey response rates to 2 other hospitals in the region.

The candidate does not provide a reasonable description of the hospital’s demographic patient population and services provided.

The candidate provides a reasonable description, with no detail, of the hospital’s demographic patient population and services provided.

The candidate provides a reasonable description, with limited detail, of the hospital’s demographic patient population and services provided.

The candidate provides a reasonable description, with adequate detail, of the hospital’s demographic patient population and services provided.

The candidate provides a reasonable description, with substantial detail, of the hospital’s demographic patient population and services provided.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how cultural dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how cultural dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how cultural dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how cultural dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how cultural dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how educational dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how educational dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how educational dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how educational dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how educational dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how socioeconomic dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how socioeconomic dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how socioeconomic dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how socioeconomic dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how socioeconomic dynamics could potentially influence HCAHPS scores.

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of the potential short- and long-term financial impact on the organization.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of the potential short- and long-term financial impact on the organization.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of the potential short- and long-term financial impact on the organization.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of the potential short- and long-term financial impact on the organization.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of the potential short- and long-term financial impact on the organization.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the potential impact on quality outcomes.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the potential impact on quality outcomes.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the potential impact on quality outcomes.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the potential impact on quality outcomes.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the potential impact on quality outcomes.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the potential cause of the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of the potential cause of the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of the potential cause of the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of the potential cause of the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of the potential cause of the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores.

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how organizational change can help improve the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no support, of how organizational change can help improve the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited support, of how organizational change can help improve the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate support, of how organizational change can help improve the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial support, of how organizational change can help improve the chosen hospital’s HCAHPS scores.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the structure, process, and outcomes of the strategic plan.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the structure, process, and outcomes of the strategic plan.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the structure, process, and outcomes of the strategic plan.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the structure, process, and outcomes of the strategic plan.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the structure, process, and outcomes of the strategic plan.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how to incorporate evidence-based practice and shared governance to improve organizational quality.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of how to incorporate evidence-based practice and shared governance to improve organizational quality.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of how to incorporate evidence-based practice and shared governance to improve organizational quality.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of how to incorporate evidence-based practice and shared governance to improve organizational quality.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of how to incorporate evidence-based practice and shared governance to improve organizational quality.

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of methods that would be used to incorporate concepts of shared accountability among patients, medical providers, payers, and personnel.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate concepts of shared accountability among patients, medical providers, payers, and personnel.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate concepts of shared accountability among patients, medical providers, payers, and personnel.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate concepts of shared accountability among patients, medical providers, payers, and personnel.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate concepts of shared accountability among patients, medical providers, payers, and personnel.

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of methods that would be used to incorporate technology trends within healthcare.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate technology trends within healthcare.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate technology trends within healthcare.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate technology trends within healthcare.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of methods that would be used to incorporate technology trends within healthcare.

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of methods that would be used to improve the care delivery system, including the topics of quality, cost, access, and patient-centered care.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no support, of methods that would be used to improve the care delivery system, including the topics of quality, cost, access, and patient-centered care.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited support, of methods that would be used to improve the care delivery system, including the topics of quality, cost, access, and patient-centered care.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate support, of methods that would be used to improve the care delivery system, including the topics of quality, cost, access, and patient-centered care.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial support, of methods that would be used to improve the care delivery system, including the topics of quality, cost, access, and patient-centered care.

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of methods that would be used to improve financial stability.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no support, of methods that would be used to improve financial stability.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited support, of methods that would be used to improve financial stability.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate support, of methods that would be used to improve financial stability.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial support, of methods that would be used to improve financial stability.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of key roles and responsibilities of stakeholders.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how to ensure stakeholder accountability and involvement.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how to ensure stakeholder accountability and involvement.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how to ensure stakeholder accountability and involvement.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how to ensure stakeholder accountability and involvement.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how to ensure stakeholder accountability and involvement.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of training staff would need in order to implement the plan.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of training staff would need in order to implement the plan.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of training staff would need in order to implement the plan.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of training staff would need in order to implement the plan.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of training staff would need in order to implement the plan.

The candidate does not outline an appropriate timeline for implementation of the plan, including periodic review checkpoints to measure progress.

Not applicable.

The candidate outlines an appropriate timeline, with insufficient detail, for implementation of the plan, including periodic review checkpoints to measure progress.

Not applicable.

The candidate outlines an appropriate timeline, with sufficient detail, for implementation of the plan, including periodic review checkpoints to measure progress.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how to evaluate the success of the strategic plan, including the given points.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how to evaluate the success of the strategic plan, including the given points.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how to evaluate the success of the strategic plan, including the given points.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how to evaluate the success of the strategic plan, including the given points.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how to evaluate the success of the strategic plan, including the given points.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how to involve key stakeholders in the evaluation process.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of how to involve key stakeholders in the evaluation process.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of how to involve key stakeholders in the evaluation process.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of how to involve key stakeholders in the evaluation process.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of how to involve key stakeholders in the evaluation process.

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how to communicate the evaluation results internally and externally.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of how to communicate the evaluation results internally and externally.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of how to communicate the evaluation results internally and externally.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of how to communicate the evaluation results internally and externally.

The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of how to communicate the evaluation results internally and externally.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and references.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides only some in-text citations and references.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major deviations from APA style.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with minor deviations from APA style.

When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources.